Gain a greater understanding of the IB programme evaluation by becoming an Evaluation Leader. IB programme evaluation supports schools in continuously extending their capacity to implement and develop IB programmes to have a greater impact on student outcomes through the development of teacher and leader practice. IB World Schools participate in programme evaluation every five years after authorization to support their ongoing work.
Benefits of becoming an Evaluation Leader
- Experience a unique professional development opportunity.
- Play an integral role in the IB programme evaluation process.
- Gain international educational experience.
- Deepen your understanding of IB programmes.
Responsibilities
- Coordinating and managing the pre-visit meetings and evaluation visit.
- Completing the evaluation report.
Evaluation Leaders collaborate closely with Programme Leaders, sharing the responsibility for providing schools with a positive experience and meaningful feedback.
Requirements
Evaluation Leaders must have strategic leadership experience. They typically are, or have been, in school leadership positions (for example, head of school, principal, head of section, assistant principal). They may be in a central office or group-of-school leadership position, or recently retired. All IB educators must be committed to staying current with IB requirements and programme changes.
How to become an Evaluation Leader
If you feel you meet the requirements, please check the vacancies table below and apply.
Find out more about the Evaluation Leader role and recruitment policy [PDF, 140 KB]
Before applying, please review our conflicts of interest information.
In alignment with the IB Academic Honesty Policy, all work and information submitted by applicants during either the application process or training needs to comply with the following statement: Applicants need to be aware that the IB does not regard any work produced—even only in part— by such tools to be their own. Therefore, as with any quote or material from another source, it must be clear that any AI-generated text, image or graph included in a piece of work has been copied from such software. The software must be credited in the body of the text and appropriately referenced in the bibliography. If this is not done, the applicant (training participant) would be misrepresenting content—as it was not originally written by them—which is a form of academic misconduct.
